• Participation within this 'World Football' is only available to members who have had 5+ posts approved elsewhere.

ECHO Comment: "Fears of Witch-hunt Against Liverpool FC"

Status
Not open for further replies.
caught said:
Yeah, sinister. Look it up, along with the term 'ultra' and when it is and isn't appropriate to use quotation.

I'm sorry you couldn't help but get personal, too. My point, as I'm afraid you're failed to understand several times, is not about Rodgers. It's about ridiculing someone's sexuality. I don't think there's ever cause to do it, which I don't see as being boring, just giving a sh*t about other humans.

Sorry you're so offended by that.
Click to expand...

You a tranny aren't you mate xxx
 

caught said:
Yeah, sinister. Look it up, along with the term 'ultra' and when it is and isn't appropriate to use quotation.

I'm sorry you couldn't help but get personal, too. My point, as I'm afraid you're failed to understand several times, is not about Rodgers. It's about ridiculing someone's sexuality. I don't think there's ever cause to do it, which I don't see as being boring, just giving a sh*t about other humans.

Sorry you're so offended by that.
Click to expand...

Mate, I dont think anyone is ridiculing anyones sexuality. They are ridiculing Rogers. In a "laugh at Liverpool" thread. Like I have said, in any other thread on here, I would agree with you, but just not in this one ffs.
 
caught said:
Not me, although I think you probably had it coming.

And I don't think it's a matter of political correctness, Chico. There's plenty of ways to laugh at Rogers without bringing sexuality into it. To mock anyone for having sex with a transsexual is to imply that there's something shameful or inproper about the act, which there isn't. But as I'm clearly in the minority here I doubt anyone's going to agree.
Click to expand...
I agree.
 

caught said:
Yeah, sinister. Look it up, along with the term 'ultra' and when it is and isn't appropriate to use quotation.

I'm sorry you couldn't help but get personal, too. My point, as I'm afraid you're failed to understand several times, is not about Rodgers. It's about ridiculing someone's sexuality. I don't think there's ever cause to do it, which I don't see as being boring, just giving a sh*t about other humans.

Sorry you're so offended by that.
Click to expand...

It's just a bit of fun. If I was a transvestite I would completely understand this thread and, to be honest, it would be you that annoyed me with you desperation to appease and apologise. People of alternative (to straight) sexualtities have a sense of humour too you know(except you of course).
 
roydo said:
Mate, I dont think anyone is ridiculing anyones sexuality. They are ridiculing Rogers. In a "laugh at Liverpool" thread. Like I have said, in any other thread on here, I would agree with you, but just not in this one ffs.
Click to expand...

No, I get your point. But it's ridiculing him because of the idea he had sex with a transsexual. I'm not claiming anyone's written anything homophobic (although a few have implied that it is a homosexual act, even though she's anatomically female) but, as I originally said, there's no reason the hypothetical sexual act deserves ridicule in my opinion, especially since it can be inferred as a bigoted response.

Now I'm responding to weirdos talking about high horses and 'PC GONE MAD!!' rubbish, trying to explain that's not where I'm coming from, which is more and more seeming like a futile exercise.
 

bol-uk said:
It's just a bit of fun. If I was a transvestite I would completely understand this thread and, to be honest, it would be you that annoyed me with you desperation to appease and apologise. People of alternative (to straight) sexualtities have a sense of humour too you know(except you of course).
Click to expand...

I have a sense of humour. I'm laughing at you right now, for example. At you're witty username, which is a splendid display of your great sense of humour, at the fact you're completely ignorant to the difference between a transvestite and a transsexual (do you think it's a bit gay to know the difference, eh?), and I'm also laughing at you putting yourself into the mind of some "tranny" and, in a wonderfully helpful coincidence, having the exact same opinion as you would dressed in your own manly Le Coq baby blue trakkie. lol
 
caught said:
No, I get your point. But it's ridiculing him because of the idea he had sex with a transsexual. I'm not claiming anyone's written anything homophobic (although a few have implied that it is a homosexual act, even though she's anatomically female) but, as I originally said, there's no reason the hypothetical sexual act deserves ridicule in my opinion, especially since it can be inferred as a bigoted response.

Now I'm responding to weirdos talking about high horses and 'PC GONE MAD!!' rubbish, trying to explain that's not where I'm coming from, which is more and more seeming like a futile exercise.
Click to expand...

Well it is futile in this thread mate. The fella has been ridiculed for his looks, his grammer, his infidelities, his transfer fees, his envelopes, his "Brentness", his son, his photo on the wall at home, most players he has bought, the "Welsh Messi", the Sun photo, etc etc. This is just an addition to that really.

It really has nothing to do with having sex with someone, it is the fact ( or fiction more like), that it is funny. And him.
 

Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome

Join Grand Old Team to get involved in the Everton discussion. Signing up is quick, easy, and completely free.

Register

Shop

Back
Top