Crazy in which way ?It’s crazy for James Garner
would you want more or be Happy with that ?
Crazy in which way ?It’s crazy for James Garner
Going by his brand of smug condescension towards our players in the past who aren't iwobi , I would say that he feels 30 million would be an excessive fee for Garner , in this market I think it would be accurate.Crazy in which way ?
would you want more or be Happy with that ?
It really isn't.It’s crazy for James Garner
Crazy in which way ?
would you want more or be Happy with that ?
Accurate is still one we should take!Going by his brand of smug condescension towards our players in the past who aren't iwobi , I would say that he feels 30 million would be an excessive fee for Garner , in this market I think it would be accurate.
A player being a consistent performer in the PL should be all the upside needed for us to want to keep him.Accurate is still one we should take!
I like Garner, but I don’t think he’s got the type of upside that means we should resist an offer.
Love the start of the response..Going by his brand of smug condescension towards our players in the past who aren't iwobi , I would say that he feels 30 million would be an excessive fee for Garner , in this market I think it would be accurate.
I think his contract has an option for another year. I’m honestly not sure, some places have said it runs through 2027.A player being a consistent performer in the PL should be all the upside needed for us to want to keep him.
Easy to say sell and replace with a player who has the potential to become world class but that's obviously easier said than done.
Besides, he's got 1 year on his contract. Either he accepts a new deal and stays for another 3-4 years, or he leaves for an insignificant fee. There's no scenario where we bring in a decent amount of money for him this summer.
This is how you get better when you’re a club like ours right now.Love the start of the response..
I would say if your looking at his contract length now, than you probably wouldn’t get a higher offer come the summer.
If you took the contract situation out of it, who could you replace Garner with for £30mil.
You would have to take a massive gamble on a young player that would still then take time to adapt.
Just get his signature back on a contract slip.
No, you bring that player in and give them time to adapt and find their way into the team, whilst still having strength in that position.This is how you get better when you’re a club like ours right now.
Genuinely no clue about that, but say we extended for 1 year and then sold him i dont think we would see full value regardless.I think his contract has an option for another year. I’m honestly not sure, some places have said it runs through 2027.
We might be 13th instead of 11th.No, you bring that player in and give them time to adapt and find their way into the team, whilst still having strength in that position.
A gamble on a player isn't a guarantee, so you have to factor that in before creating a hole.
If you're talking right now, you take Garner out of the team up until now this season and see where we'd be.
Without him in the middle, without him covering LB and without him covering RB.
Think about that.
The only player that we should build around is Ndiaye and we probably won’t be able to keep him unfortunately. This squad is highly expendable right now. We need some wheeler dealers.Genuinely no clue about that, but say we extended for 1 year and then sold him i dont think we would see full value regardless.
Moot point to me as I think he's one of a core group of starters that should be kept and built around.