B
Big Fat Sam
Guest
It's not that bloody hard to put a ball into the box, I just cannot understand why we can't swing a ball in that beats the first man. Proper annoying.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
It's not that bloody hard to put a ball into the box, I just cannot understand why we can't swing a ball in that beats the first man. Proper annoying.
It would have carried him into the the net with the ball if he'd reached it anyway lidDon't know if it's already been mentioned but what do you boys make of Gary Neville's analysis that Mignolet should have saved Jagielka's strike?
Sounds ridiculous at first but it does make sense when you watch him explain
Don't know if it's already been mentioned but what do you boys make of Gary Neville's analysis that Mignolet should have saved Jagielka's strike?
Sounds ridiculous at first but it does make sense when you watch him explain
About 5:10 onwards for anyone interested, I can see what he's saying but with the swerve and power behind that shot I don't think there are many keepers that will have stopped that.
Don't know if it's already been mentioned but what do you boys make of Gary Neville's analysis that Mignolet should have saved Jagielka's strike?
Sounds ridiculous at first but it does make sense when you watch him explain
About 5:10 onwards for anyone interested, I can see what he's saying but with the swerve and power behind that shot I don't think there are many keepers that will have stopped that.
No basis to Neville's ridiculous comments. Different goalies have different styles. The converse of what he said is that if Jagielka had hit it low, he'd have had a better chance of saving it. You pays your money.........
With Neville's logic, EVERY goal ever scored could be put down to a fault somewhere along the line -- including that every penalty could be saved ie IF the goaly's starting position and IF the subsequent direction of dive were, in the event, right.
Carragher reminds me of a lad on my uni course - half English, half Danish wool from Maghull who greatly exaggerated his scouse and supported Denmark on international weekends. He was the Obadiah Hakeswill of Kopites, popular only because he "knew some guys who had VIP wristbands".
To give you an idea of how loathed this guy was, there were at least 12 other RS supporters in the cohort, and THEY were utterly sick of him themselves! He would talk nothing but tactics (badly) and how Torres was going to be the next Ian Rush (chortle chortle).
This guy thought he knew EVERYTHING about LFC and how to manage them when he blatantly didn't (he actually works at LFC tv now, so ideal place for him I suppose).
In short Carragher makes me want to reach for da bleach... or maybe something metal and pointy.
don't know to be honest mate but he definitely should've saved it.Did he analyse how Howard should have saved Gerrard's free kick? Or did it remain "a stunning free kick"? Yeah, thought so
About 5:10 onwards for anyone interested, I can see what he's saying but with the swerve and power behind that shot I don't think there are many keepers that will have stopped that.
Did he analyse how Howard should have saved Gerrard's free kick? Or did it remain "a stunning free kick"? Yeah, thought so